![]() ![]() That function will receive the previous state as the first argument, and the props at the time the update is applied as the second argument: > To fix it, use a second form of setState() that accepts a function rather than an object. For example, this code may fail to update the counter:Ĭounter: + , Because this.props and this.state may be updated asynchronously, you should not rely on their values for calculating the next state. > React may batch multiple setState() calls into a single update for performance. The main "tick" function `VirtualizedList._updateCellsToRender()` calculates this new state using a combination of the current component state, and instance-local state like maps, measurement caches, etc. This state is set via the `setState()` class component API. `VirtualizedList`'s component state is a set of cells to render. Remove `this.props` usage during state update where we can just use the props directly. See the stack summary below for more information on the broader change. This diff is part of an overall stack, meant to fix incorrect usage of `setState()` in `VirtualizedList`, which triggers new invariant checks added in `VirtualizedList_EXPERIMENTAL`. VirtualizedList up-to-date state: Remove _isVirtualizationDisabled() Summary:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |